Plandemic: The Covid-19 Conspiracy
As I write this article, today marks a significant turning point in our society, the UK Government's enforcement of mandatory face-mask wearing in shops and other enclosed spaces. Of course, other countries around the world are also pushing the same strict regulations on their citizens too, but I speak from the perspective of an Englishman unhappy with the fascistic measures currently being imposed upon the general public.
In my previous post The Coronavirus Hoax, I highlighted some of the inconsistencies coming from health officials aiding government decisions concerning the Covid-19 led impositions, and suggested that we are witnessing one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetuated on humankind.
This post will look at material published before this false pandemic changed the world; material which exposes the fact that the whole affair was pre-planned down to the minutiae. (Information explaining why the pandemic is fake is way too much to squeeze into a small blog post such as this, so might I suggest doing some deeper research if you are truly curious and new to this concept?)
First let us revisit a document produced in 2010 by the Rockefeller Foundation titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. This is the same Rockefeller family that was found guilty of corruption, illegal business practices and racketeering by the Supreme Court of the U.S. back in May 1911. It looks like corruption runs in the family.
Ten years ago, these 'possible' future scenarios were being played out on paper with the alleged intent of better preparing the world for such extreme situations which may or may not arise one day. But the wording of the document is eerily prophetic and the sentiment feels somewhat fascistic.
One decade before 'Lockdown' became such a prominent aspect of everyday life, albeit fleetingly, the Rockefeller Foundation had already conceived of Lock Step.
Lock Step is described in the document as 'A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.'
Well that brief introduction into this 'future' scenario certainly rings true in present times. The document continues below (I have highlighted lines of interest in bold):
'In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly.
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit.
Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.'
I think some of you will agree that the tone of this prophetic piece of writing is far from being simple future planning to protect the world from a deadly disease, and sound more like a declaration of intent.
In October 2019, a global pandemic exercise named Event 201 was funded by Johns Hopkins University (a major source of Covid-19 infection figures worldwide), the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (the man who owns 15% of the World Health Organisation and is publicly pushing for the entire global population to be vaccinated).
Taken from the Event 201 website:
'Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modelled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.' (1)
It is interesting to note that around six weeks before a novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in Wuhan, China, a novel coronavirus 'modelled largely on SARS' was the culprit in a global pandemic exercise. If you asked any person without a medical background in October last year if they had ever heard of a coronavirus, I am pretty sure that the vast majority would decisively answer no. Not only that, but the Event 201 scenario explains that it originated from bats, coincidentally matching the alleged origin of Covid-19 only six weeks later.
Just another coincidence?
Designed by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, the Event 201 scenario was intended to test global preparedness in the face of a severe pandemic, and any similarities to the actual pandemic that followed were purely fortuitous in their eyes, and most details of the exercise did not mirror those of the 'real' scenario.
Back in January, Dr Eric Toner who worked on the simulation explained that there were some parallels between the two scenarios; "Now that the disease is widespread in China, we see the beginning of the cascading economic and societal consequences illustrated in our exercise."
Interesting that these were the only similarities mentioned by Dr, Toner. Does he also believe that the pandemic exercise virus matching the actual virus, which suddenly appeared less than two months later, was pure coincidence? It is possible of course, but possibility alone does not override probability. The chances of accidentally simulating a situation which came to fruition with such precision in such a short space of time must be considered extremely small, yet still it happened.
It is simulations like those highlighted above which are strongly indicative of a pre-planned global pandemic, and tied in with the incessant vaccination promotion from the omnipresent Bill Gates, one must begin to question why such extreme measures like the mandatory use of face coverings has come to pass, despite scientific evidence against their actual effectiveness.
Societal behaviour modification is nothing new of course, and the recent draconian measures being imposed on the general public only serve to prove the Government's covert use of such techniques in forwarding previously conceived agendas.
As the 2009 Cabinet Office document called MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy states:
'Influencing behaviour is central to public policy. Recently, there have been major advances in understanding the influences on our behaviours, and government needs to take notice of them.
. . . much of behaviour change is about battling habits – either to change them or to use other habitual or hard-wired responses to nudge ourselves in a different direction. Habits are "behavioural dispositions to repeat well-practised actions given recurring circumstances‟, and they usually develop when actions are repeatedly paired with an event or context.'
An event like a global pandemic perhaps?
And here we are approaching August 2020, and already the idea of a 'second wave' of COVID-19 infection is doing the rounds and instilling even more fear into an already fatigued population of innocent citizens around the world.
This final document I would like to share with you which was published very recently on July 14, 2020, already predicts a second onslaught of this 'deadly' virus wiping out England in the near future.
The Preparing For a Challenging Winter 2020/21 document written by the Academy of Medical Sciences, is predicting a possible death toll of 120,000 between September 2020 and June 2021, based on more computer modelling. Well it certain'y worked out well last time around didn't it Prof. Ferguson of Imperial College, London (his predictions were only slightly askew by about 470,000 deaths).
Below are just some of highlights of the research undertaken by the Academy of Medical Sciences in London which was commissioned by the trusty Government's chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance.
Please don't ask how they can possibly know a 'second peak' will occur, just trust them, they are scientists. It's not like they are basing all of their information on false information or anything, because that would make a mockery of the whole affair.
'July and August must be a period of intense preparation for our reasonable worst-case scenario for health in the winter that we set out in this report, including a resurgence of COVID-19, which might be greater than that seen in the spring.
Modelling of our reasonable worst-case scenario – in which the effective reproduction rate of SARS-CoV-2 (Rt) rises to 1.7 from September 2020 onwards – suggests a peak in hospital admissions and deaths in January/February 2021 of a similar magnitude to that of the first wave in spring 2020, coinciding with a period of peak demand on the NHS. We are already seeing local outbreaks. The modelling estimates 119,900 (95% CrI 24,500 - 251,000) hospital deaths between September 2020 and June 2021, over double the number that occurred during the first wave in spring 2020.
Maintaining a comprehensive, population-wide, near-real-time, granular health surveillance system to ensure rapid identification, investigation and management of local COVID-19 outbreaks across community, work, and health and social care settings.
. . . we know that winter climatic conditions and more time spent indoors will favour the spread of SARS-CoV-2
. . . mitigations for a resurgence of COVID-19 this winter will need to be substantially different to that used for the first wave of infection in spring 2020.
. . . large local or regional resurgences are possible
. . . outbreaks of COVID-19 in hospitals and care homes are likely to become common again
In the winter months, lower temperatures and humidity may facilitate SARSCoV-2 transmission . . .'
So that's reassuring then. Before people can even get their feet back on the ground, we are being prepared for an outbreak double the severity of that we have just witnessed, because cold weather and influenza is suddenly a decisive factor. Who would have seen that coming?
If you want my advice, take everything that the mainstream media is throwing at you with an industrial-sized vat of salt, do your own research, and try to live life your way. If you don't want to cover your face with a muzzle which some consider as 'a badge of subservience and submission' (2), then simply don't.
And please, please, please, for the future of your children and all that is sacred in this rapidly changing world, do not allow your children to cover up, out of fear of judgement of others, all under the premise of nonscientific, nonsensical government advice.
This is our world. Let's keep it that way.