The Coronavirus Test Is Meaningless
The only thing that the Covid-19 test is actually testing is my patience.
Considering that the entire pandemic hoax is entirely dependant on the test results to reveal how serious this 'killer virus' actually is, means that all other information such as numbers, opinions, advice, and procedures concerning coronavirus, are simply null and void without a legitimate test. I'm sure that everybody no matter where they have chosen to show their allegiance in this ridiculous and tiresome game of side-choosing, will agree on that premise alone. The test is the key. It is 100% vital to any information on the true scale of the spread or actual existence of covid. All other details are just noise, and we would do well to remember that fact as we continue to argue with each other about who is right or wrong.
So why do I claim the test is meaningless? Let's discuss that in a bit more depth.
For starters, the real time RT-PCR test which stands for Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction DOES NOT TEST FOR VIRUSES. That should be fully understood from the beginning. It is also NOT a binary test, like a pregnancy test for example, which simply churns out positive or negative results. It is much more complex than that, and a millions times more unreliable.
The test was created by American biochemist Kary Mullis who passed away in 2019 so fortunately for him, couldn't be around to see the shit show which his test is currently responsible for. The test which won him the 2003 Nobel Prize in Chemistry has already been at the heart of much controversy during his lifetime, and has already been massively misused since its conception. Mullis spent the latter years of his life controversially disputing the use of the PCR in diagnosing HIV patients, and there is a lot of information to digest concerning AIDS if one cares to delve deeper into that pool.
Its intended use is to 'apply it as manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.'(1)
As Mullis himself once said, “Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.”
Aside from not being fit for purpose, the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare the results with. This is a fundamental point. In order to determine their preciseness —it is essential that each test is evaluated for sensitivity and specificity — by comparison with the most accurate method available which is termed a 'gold standard'.
For example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself.
But in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?” Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake explained that:
"If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”
When all this chaos first started to accelerate in back in spring I downloaded the official CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel pdf file from the CDC's website which clarifies that the results are for 'the identification of 2019-nCov RNA'.
It is of course no secret that they are testing for RNA (genetic material) rather than what the general public believe, that it simply shows whether you have the virus or not.
I was astounded to find that even on the instruction manual it clearly states :
Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.